<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Waterski the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.waterskitheweb.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.waterskitheweb.com</link>
	<description>When surfing just isn&#039;t enough.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:26:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I&#8217;m On Twitter Now What? by Waterski the Web &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Facebook Changes Again &#8211; Wants to Make Your Actions Public</title>
		<link>http://www.waterskitheweb.com/2009/11/im-on-twitter-now-what/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Waterski the Web &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Facebook Changes Again &#8211; Wants to Make Your Actions Public</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterskitheweb.com/?p=53#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter was the public side of you, where you could share your expertise in hobbies, industry, and passions and at the same time, inform people that you just took your dog to the dog park.  I&#8217;ve often suggested that Twitter is best when its a mix of business &amp; pleasure. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter was the public side of you, where you could share your expertise in hobbies, industry, and passions and at the same time, inform people that you just took your dog to the dog park.  I&#8217;ve often suggested that Twitter is best when its a mix of business &amp; pleasure. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Mail: 7 Reasons it&#8217;s Keys to the Web City by Burt Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.waterskitheweb.com/2009/11/google-mail-7-reasons-its-keys-to-the-web-city/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Burt Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterskitheweb.com/?p=24#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Thanks again for a nice site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again for a nice site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on #WatchOut!- A Twitter Virus Warning by Kirk</title>
		<link>http://www.waterskitheweb.com/2009/12/watchout-a-twitter-virus-warning/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterskitheweb.com/?p=172#comment-16</guid>
		<description>The issue is every Twitter related website/tool requires you to enter your login info for Twitter.  I never understood or trusted that, no matter what site it is.

If the site says &quot;Don&#039;t worry, we won&#039;t give out your info&quot; that&#039;s not very believable (yet people do it anyway).

In fact, if you want to harvest Twitter accounts, make a semi interesting tool, and do just that.

I&#039;ve seen similar issues with Gmail accounts (log in and we&#039;ll check to see if your friends are on our service).  Google fails at this as well by not providing a custom address book feed.  This is a simple fix.  Enter the url of the site asking for your contacts, Gmail generates a unique url w/random code (for that site&#039;s URL only).  You&#039;d have to do this for each site that asks, but that would lock it down so the url can&#039;t be given out (granted if the site is shady they can just strip that list and do whatever with it) but it does give the user some safety and they never have to give out their login info.

The &quot;Web 2.0&quot; world is really just a bunch of suckers, that are way too trusting with their data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue is every Twitter related website/tool requires you to enter your login info for Twitter.  I never understood or trusted that, no matter what site it is.</p>
<p>If the site says &#8220;Don&#8217;t worry, we won&#8217;t give out your info&#8221; that&#8217;s not very believable (yet people do it anyway).</p>
<p>In fact, if you want to harvest Twitter accounts, make a semi interesting tool, and do just that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen similar issues with Gmail accounts (log in and we&#8217;ll check to see if your friends are on our service).  Google fails at this as well by not providing a custom address book feed.  This is a simple fix.  Enter the url of the site asking for your contacts, Gmail generates a unique url w/random code (for that site&#8217;s URL only).  You&#8217;d have to do this for each site that asks, but that would lock it down so the url can&#8217;t be given out (granted if the site is shady they can just strip that list and do whatever with it) but it does give the user some safety and they never have to give out their login info.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; world is really just a bunch of suckers, that are way too trusting with their data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Technorati: Center of the Blog Universe by Tony  Berkman</title>
		<link>http://www.waterskitheweb.com/2009/11/technorati-center-of-the-blog-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony  Berkman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterskitheweb.com/?p=165#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Technorati certainly has the numbers and enables you to easily identify the A list bloggers.  Unfortunately without some form of human involvement in the screening process, they are swamped with spam blogs.     BlogCatalog,  which I am part of,   reviews each blog submission making it easier for readers to discover great blogs, that are less known.   Add to that a community crowd sourcing element, which Technorati lacks, and BlogCatalog is a platform where many media pros visit to find great blogs and connect with their writers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technorati certainly has the numbers and enables you to easily identify the A list bloggers.  Unfortunately without some form of human involvement in the screening process, they are swamped with spam blogs.     BlogCatalog,  which I am part of,   reviews each blog submission making it easier for readers to discover great blogs, that are less known.   Add to that a community crowd sourcing element, which Technorati lacks, and BlogCatalog is a platform where many media pros visit to find great blogs and connect with their writers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on #WatchOut!- A Twitter Virus Warning by Twitted by CaseyChesh</title>
		<link>http://www.waterskitheweb.com/2009/12/watchout-a-twitter-virus-warning/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by CaseyChesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterskitheweb.com/?p=172#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by CaseyChesh [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by CaseyChesh [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Wave: Real Time Communication and Collaboration by Waterski the Web &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 5 Ways To Get An Invite For Google Wave</title>
		<link>http://www.waterskitheweb.com/2009/11/google-wave-real-time-communication-and-collaboration/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Waterski the Web &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 5 Ways To Get An Invite For Google Wave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterskitheweb.com/?p=103#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] you&#8217;d like more information. I&#8217;ve posted a great overview of Google Wave.   Share this post with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you&#8217;d like more information. I&#8217;ve posted a great overview of Google Wave.   Share this post with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Technorati: Center of the Blog Universe by uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.waterskitheweb.com/2009/11/technorati-center-of-the-blog-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterskitheweb.com/?p=165#comment-12</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by CaseyChesh: My Blog: Technorati: Center of the Blog Universe http://bit.ly/7syXyq...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by CaseyChesh: My Blog: Technorati: Center of the Blog Universe <a href="http://bit.ly/7syXyq.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7syXyq..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Reader: Plug into the Matrix by Waterski the Web &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Technorati: Center of the Blog Universe</title>
		<link>http://www.waterskitheweb.com/2009/11/google-reader-plug-into-the-matrix/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Waterski the Web &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Technorati: Center of the Blog Universe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterskitheweb.com/?p=91#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] lot of blogs in a short period of time.  When in doubt, add the blogs that catch your eye to your Google Reader.  You can always fine tune and cull (haha) your subscriptions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lot of blogs in a short period of time.  When in doubt, add the blogs that catch your eye to your Google Reader.  You can always fine tune and cull (haha) your subscriptions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mint.com &#8211; Give it ALL of the logins to your Bank Accounts? by Casey Cheshire</title>
		<link>http://www.waterskitheweb.com/2009/11/mint-com-give-it-all-of-the-logins-to-your-bank-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Cheshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterskitheweb.com/?p=116#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Exactly, most banks will require you to confirm any new transfers by mail.  I remember having to wait for a letter (with a confirmation code) to arrive before they would allow me to transfer any funds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, most banks will require you to confirm any new transfers by mail.  I remember having to wait for a letter (with a confirmation code) to arrive before they would allow me to transfer any funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mint.com &#8211; Give it ALL of the logins to your Bank Accounts? by f1vlad</title>
		<link>http://www.waterskitheweb.com/2009/11/mint-com-give-it-all-of-the-logins-to-your-bank-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>f1vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waterskitheweb.com/?p=116#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Even if someone finds out your login to your bank account. What bad can they do? Check the balance? Or transfer money between checking to saving? I thought about this, too and don&#039;t see how mint overall is insecure.

I use it and love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if someone finds out your login to your bank account. What bad can they do? Check the balance? Or transfer money between checking to saving? I thought about this, too and don&#8217;t see how mint overall is insecure.</p>
<p>I use it and love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

